Extended Menace Squeezes (Tutorial)

This page is a simple tutorial; the second page is more advanced and the entry shifting page is very advanced.

Introduction

To review, a simple squeeze occurs when you have two threats against one person. The count must be correct -- you must have winners to cover all of the remaining tricks but one. In other words, you have one loser. When the simple squeeze works, you win all of the remaining tricks. For example,
	A109
	AJ
	--
	--

KQJ
KQ
--
--

	xx
	x
	---
	AK
There are five tricks remaining, you have four winners, and you have two threats against LHO (your left-hand opponent). When you cash your first club, LHO pitches as spade, as does dummy; on the second club, LHO is forced to unguard one of the majors, making your jack on the board good.

In the above card position, the dummy happens to have an "extended menace" in spades, though it is irrelevant to the simple squeeze. The 10 is the threat against LHO, but the 10 is accompanied by the 9. On the first club, LHO had to pitch a spade, which essentially made the 9 good. Of course, to actually withdraw that 9 from the bank, you would have had to first lose a spade trick. Because you already had enough winners to win all of the tricks but one -- your goal was to win all of the remaining tricks -- it did not help you when LHO was forced to unguard your extended menace.

The other point to notice, which is critical to understanding extended menace squeezes, is the squeeze on the extended menace operated one trick sooner than the simple squeeze. Essentially, the need to guard the extended menace put an extra busy card in LHO's hand.

The Simple Extended Menace Squeeze

Okay, let's take away a club winner.

	A109
	AJ
	--
	--

KQJ                     ---
KQ                      ---
--                      ---
--                      KQxxx

	xx
	x
	---
	Ax
Now, you have two threats against LHO, but there is no squeeze because you have not rectified the count. However, the squeeze against the extended menace works one trick sooner, so the count is rectified for purposes of the extended menace squeeze.

So, you lead your ace of clubs, and LHO is squeezed. If LHO discards a heart, your jack of hearts is good; if LHO discards a spade, you duck a round of spades and now your nine of spades is good. You had to lose a trick to make your extended menace good, but that's all right -- you started out with two losers and a goal of just losing one of the remaining tricks.

Extended Menace Squeeze Vs. Simple Squeeze

In the above hand, you could have led a small club, rectifying the count for a simple squeeze. Then on RHO's forced club return, you would win the ace of clubs and have a simple squeeze. In general, if you can rectify the count for a simple squeeze, you should choose the simple squeeze over the extended menace squeeze. This is because you can usually run a simple squeeze so that you do not have to guess what people have saved (though not in the above example). In the extended menace squeeze, you have to peer into the opponent's distribution. In the above example, what you lead after the squeeze card depends on what you guess LHO has unguarded. Most players wait until the squeeze card to make the critical discard. A good player might try to trick you, which is rarely a problem, but a bad player simply might not understand which cards are valuable.

Of course, if we give RHO a diamond, RHO has a winner to cash and you cannot afford to let RHO win a trick; if we give RHO a spade or heart, RHO can return that suit and ruin your squeeze. So it is often the case that you cannot afford to lose a trick to rectify the count for a simple squeeze. If you have only single menaces, you have to try to rectify the count; if you have an extended menace, you can run the extended menace simple squeeze.

Control in the Short Suit

In the extended menace squeeze, you must have the top card (or at least a control) in the other suit. If you don't, the opp cashes the winner in that suit. For example:

	A109
	J
	--
	--

KQJ                    ---
Q                      ---
--                     ---
--                     KQxx

	xx
	x
	---
	A
The lead of the ace of clubs forces LHO to release a spade, making the extended menace in spades good. However, when a spade is ducked to LHO, LHO cashed a good heart.

A winner in the extended threat suit is not necessary:

	109
	AJ
	--
	--

QJ                     ---
KQ                     ---
--                     ---
--                     KQxx

	xx
	x
	---
	A
On the lead of the Ace of clubs, LHO pitches a spade. You pitch a heart from dummy, lead a spade, and the dummy takes the last two tricks.

Difficulties

There are three things that make the extended menace squeeze more difficult than the simple squeeze. The first, already mentioned, is that you can usually arrange your simple squeeze so that you do not have to guess what distribution your opp started with. For the extended menace squeeze, you always have to know your opps distribution to know what suit to lead after the squeeze is completed.

The second is that you need an entry to the extended menace even after a trick has been lost in that suit. So, for example,

	A109
	J10
	--
	--

KQJ                     ---
KQ                      ---
--                      x
--                      KQxx

	x
	Ax
	---
	Ax
This extended menace squeeze does not work for lack of entry to the long spade. LHO pitches a spade on your Ace of clubs, but there is no way for you to lose a spade trick and still have an entry to the dummy. Give declarer a second spade:
	A109
	J10
	--
	--

KQJ                     ---
KQ                      ---
--                      x
--                      KQxx

	xx
	Ax
	---
	A
and the extended menace squeeze now works.

The third problem is this. In the simple squeeze, if one opp cannot stop either of the two threats, that opp is out of the picture. In the extended menace squeeze, you have to lose a trick to make your extended menace good. If the second opp can win this trick, the second opp has to be considered. For example:

	A109
	J10
	--
	--

KJx                     Q
KQ                      ---
--                      x
--                      KQx

	xx
	Ax
	---
	A
This extended menace squeeze fails. The first club forces LHO to unguard the extended menace in spades. But if you lose the first round of spades to RHO, RHO cashes clubs. You can play the ace of spades and then lose the second round of spades to LHO, but then there is no entry to the long spade.

Triply-Extended Menaces

What if you have a triply extended menace? Now the squeeze works with 3 losers, and you have to have two winners in the short suit:

	A987
	AK9
	--
	--

KQJ10                     ---
QJ10                      ---
--                        ---
--                        KQxxxxx

	xx
	xx
	---
	Axx
There are potential complexities when there is only one heart stopper but LHO cannot afford to lead the suit. I cannot imagine this arising (at least in a way that you would read the situation).
	A9876
	xx
	--
	--

QJ10xx                 ---
KQ9                    ---
--                     ---
--                     KQxxxxx

	Kxx
	AJ108
	---
	Axx

Trumps as Controls

Here, if the queen of hearts was the king, it would be obvious that you have an extended menace in hearts. But in any case, there is an extended menace in hearts. You need first-round control in the single menace suit, so your trump will have to serve as the first-round control -- it is just like the ace of diamonds, if you are in dummy and leading a diamond.

So, the final end position has to be you winning a trump trick in dummy, with you still having one trump in your hand:

K
Axx
Jx
--
     --
     KJxx
     Q8

Qx
Qxxx
--
--
To get to this position, you have to shorten your trumps in your hand by ruffing two rounds of clubs. Fortunately, you have the entries to do this.
Next: Part 2: Two Extended Menaces (Advanced)


BRIDGE HOME